UADD 94-0329 and EEOC 35C-94-0370. DIXIE APODACA Charging Party vs. FLYING J INC. Defendant.

CourtUtah
Utah Workers Compensation Decisions 1995. UADD 94-0329 and EEOC 35C-94-0370. DIXIE APODACA Charging Party vs. FLYING J INC. Defendant THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAHDIXIE APODACA, Charging Party, vs. FLYING J, INC., Defendant.UADD Case No. 94-0329 and EEOC Case No. 35C-94-0370ORDER ON "REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION"Dixie Apodaca asks the Industrial Commission to clarify its order of May 8, 1995, granting Ms. Apodaca's request for an evidentiary hearing in the above-entitled matter. Specifically, Ms. Apodaca asks whether the Industrial Commission's order should be construed as incorporating Ms. Apodaca's charges of religious and national origin discrimination into the above entitled proceeding, which arises from Ms. Apodaca's original charge of age discrimination. The Industrial Commission hereby advises the parties that in granting Ms. Apodaca's request for evidentiary hearing, the Industrial Commission's order had reference only to the charge of age discrimination, which was the basis of Ms. Apodaca's original complaint and UADD's determination. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT