Upton v. Motel 6, 120120 MNWC, WC20-6341

Case DateDecember 01, 2020
CourtMinnesota
PAMELA J. UPTON, Employee/Appellant,
v.
MOTEL 6 and LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO., Employer-Insurer/Respondents.
No. WC20-6341
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals
December 1, 2020
         CAUSATION – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Substantial evidence, including adequately founded expert medical opinion, supports the compensation judge’s finding that the employee had no disability related to her work injury.          REHABILITATION – CONSULTATION. An employee who has no employment restrictions related to the work injury is not entitled to a rehabilitation consultation.          TEMPORARY TOTAL DISABILITY – WORK RESTRICTIONS. TEMPORARY PARTIAL DISABILITY – WORK RESTRICTIONS. An employee is not eligible for wage loss benefits when not subject to employment restrictions related to the work injury.           Michael L. Garbow, Garbow Law Office, P.A., Bemidji, Minnesota, for the Appellant.           Joseph G. Twomey, Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Bradt, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, Minnesota, for the Respondents.           Determined by: Gary M. Hall, Judge, Patricia J. Milun, Chief Judge, Deborah K. Sundquist, Judge.           Compensation Judge: Adam S. Wolkoff          Affirmed.          OPINION           GARY M. HALL, Judge.          The employee appeals the compensation judge’s denial of her claims for wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and a rehabilitation consultation, based on the judge’s finding that the employee no longer had any disability related to her work-related injury. We affirm.          BACKGROUND          On May 26, 2017, Pamela Upton, the employee, sustained work-related injuries when she was physically assaulted while working as a property manager at Motel 6, the employer. She was seen at an emergency room the next day and was diagnosed with a closed facial fracture and concussion with loss of consciousness, unspecified duration. On June 1, 2017, the employee was evaluated by Orrin Mann, M.D., who noted that the employee’s post-concussive syndrome had resolved and referred her to a specialist to address the facial fracture. The employee was initially given work restrictions, but Dr. Mann released her for full-time work without restrictions on June 14, 2017. The employee continued to work for the employer, but testified that she had difficulty concentrating, which affected her job performance. The employer terminated her employment on October 15, 2017. She worked for a Motel 6 franchise for a short time in January 2018, then worked for another employer as a property manager from June 2018 to July 2019. She testified that she had difficulty performing her job and was afraid while working. Other than providing childcare for relatives, she has not worked since then but lives independently, drives, shops, and manages her finances.          As a result of the May 26, 2017, incident, the employee claimed a serious traumatic brain injury (TBI), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), concussion, and facial injuries. The employer and insurer accepted primary...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT