Van De Kamp, 010887 CAAGO, AGO 86-707

Case DateJanuary 08, 1987
CourtCalifornia
JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General
CLAYTON P. ROCHE Deputy Attorney General
AGO 86-707
No. 86-707
California Attorney General Opinion
Office of the Attorney General State of California
January 8, 1987
         THE HONORABLE RICHARD J. MOORE, COUNTY COUNSEL, ALAMEDA COUNTY, has requested an opinion on the following question:          May the increased benefits for retirees provided for in section 31681.52 of the Government Code, a provision of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, be funded from the Supplemental Retiree Benefits Reserve established pursuant to section 31618 of the Government Code?          CONCLUSION          The increased benefits for retirees provided for in section 31681.52 of the Government Code may be funded from the Supplemental Retiree Benefits Reserve established pursuant to section 31618 of the Government Code.          ANALYSIS          Alameda County is one of 20 counties which have adopted the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code section 31450 et seq.1 Under that law these 20 counties operate and fund independent retirement systems for employees in each county.          In this request for our opinion we are asked whether a particular supplemental benefit for individuals who retired on or prior to June 30, 1971, and which may be provided to them at the option of the board of supervisors pursuant to section 31681.52, may be funded from the Supplemental Retiree Benefits Reserve, a fund established pursuant to section 31618. Section 31618.52 provides a permanent increase in retirement benefits of between 2% and 10% in increments of 2% to retirees, dependent upon the year in which they retired. For retirees who retired on or prior to June 30, 1967, the increased benefit is 10%. For those who retired during the 12 months ending June 30, 1971 the increase benefit is only 2%.          In resolving this question we will examine the manner in which retirement benefits under the 1937 Act, both regular and supplemental, are financed both in counties which have adopted and which have not adopted the "alternative financial provisions" of sections 31610 through 31619 of the Government Code, which were added in 1983 as article 5.5 of the 1937 Act. Counties which have not adopted these provisions still operate under article 5. The Supplemented Retiree Benefits Reserve is a fund provided for under these new alternative financial provisions of article 5.5.          The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 provides retirement benefits for county employees (and participating special districts) which are funded by employee contributions, employer contributions, and earnings on monies contained in the retirement fund. (See generally, §§ 31453, 31580, 31581-31584, 31591-31592.3, 31610-31619, 31620 et seq.) Regular retirement benefits are funded one-half by the employees' contributions and one-half by employers' contributions. In the aggregate they reflect the employees' annuity (see § 31457) and an equal employer-provided pension (see § 31471). (See also generally section 31673 et seq.). The regular retirement annuity may be the "actuarial equivalent" of the employees' contributions, or it alternatively may be a "fixed-formula" retirement annuity, based upon a certain percentage of the employees final compensation. Alameda County operates under a "fixed- formula" retirement system.          In addition to the regular retirement allowance, the 1937 Act provides for numerous supplemental benefits which are usually provided only if the board of supervisors so resolves. These supplemental benefits include those such as placed in issue herein, which provide for a permanent addition to previously retired members' retirement allowance. They also include permanent cost-of-living adjustments (art. 16.5, § 31870 et seq.); retrospective cost-of-living adjustments (art. 16.6, § 31875 et seq.); non-permanent supplemental cost-of-living adjustments (§ 31681.8); group life and medical insurance benefits, (§§ 31691-31692); and a small death benefit for retirees' beneficiaries (§§ 31789.1, 31789.2, 31789.12, 31789.13.)          As noted, in 1983 the Legislature adopted "alternative financial provisions" for counties which have adopted the 1937 Act (Stats. 1983, ch. 886) which are themselves operative only if adopted by both the county board of retirement and the county board of supervisors. (§31610.) Thus, the Supplemental Retiree Benefits Reserve account is established only in counties which have adopted these new provisions. In order to understand the issue presented in this request, that is, the possible use of these reserves to fund the supplemental benefits provided for in section 31681.52, the financial provisions which these alternative provisions supplant or modify require discussion. The discussion will center upon the allocation of so-called "excess interest" earned on retirement fund investments, since that "excess interest" is used to fund the new Supplement Retiree Benefits Reserve.          A. ARTICLE 5 COUNTIES          Counties which have not adopted the alternative financial provisions of article 5.5 are governed by the financial provisions found in article 5 of the 1937 Act. Under the latter provisions, an article 5 county is directed to obtain at least every three years an actuarial evaluation of its retirement system. "Upon the basis of the investigation, valuation, and recommendation of the actuary, the board [of retirement] shall. . . recommend to the board of supervisors such changes in the rates of interest, in the rates of contributions of members, and in county and district appropriations as are necessary" to fund the system. "With respect to the rates of interest to be credited to members and to the county or district, the board may, in its sound discretion, recommend a rate which is higher or lower than the interest assumption rate established by the actuarial survey." (§ 31453, as incorporated by reference in § 31581, emphasis added.)          Employer and employee contributions to a retirement system such as the 1937 Act system are necessarily dependent upon and a function of accrued liabilities and assumed income. Accordingly, if the board decides to credit the employer and employee contribution accounts with less than the actuarially assumed interest rate (the assumed projected earnings of the system's investments), contributions will have to be increased; and vice versa. If the governing board fails to credit contributions with the full interest, then such interest (after certain allocations to reserves) will be available for the payment of benefits from the "advance reserves."          Sections 31592 and 31592.2 are the key provisions in this respect in article 5 counties. Section 31592 provides that interest not credited to contributions (and reserves) shall remain in the retirement fund as a reserve for contingencies, except as provided in sections 31529.5 and 31592.2. Section 31592.2 then permits the establishment of a county "advance reserves" from excess interest "for the sole purpose of payment of the cost of the benefits described in" the 1937 Act.          Accordingly, it is seen that under the foregoing provisions of the 1937 Act an article 5 county could "divert" all or virtually all interest income from the retirement system accounts which generated that income, and then, after applying the requisite amount of income to insure the minimum 1% of assets for the reserve for contingencies, allocate all the remaining income to the advance reserves for the payment of benefits.          In addition to those benefits set forth in paragraph two of section 31592.5, supra, at note 3, the 1937 Act in other provisions specifically permits or requires certain benefits to be financed from the advance reserves in an article 5 county (or from the new Supplemented Retiree Benefits Reserve in an article 5.5 county, to be discussed infra). These include some, but not all, of the supplemental benefits already alluded to above. With respect to the supplemental benefits which specifically mention the advance reserves as a source of funding, some benefits are vested and will require continued funding, whereas others are nonvested and may be withdrawn at any time by the board of supervisors.          Thus, group insurance benefits for present or future retirees (or a like increase in benefits) may be provided and funded either from employer contributions or from the advance reserves in article 5 counties. (See §§ 31691, 31691.1.) These benefits are nonvested. (§ 31692.) Likewise, a small death benefit for the benefit of retirees' beneficiaries may be financed either from county contributions or from the advance reserve, or a combination of both in article 5 counties...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT