Webber v. Utilidata, Inc., 043020 RIWC, 2016-06046

Case DateApril 30, 2020
CourtRhode Island
GEORGE WEBBER
v.
UTILIDATA, INC.
W.C.C. No. 2016-06046
Rhode Island Worker Compensation
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Providence, SC
April 30, 2020
         FINAL DECREE OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION          This matter came on to be heard by the Appellate Division upon the claim of appeal of the petitioner/employee and upon consideration thereof, the employee's appeal is denied and dismissed, and it is hereby          ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:          That the findings of fact and the orders contained in a decree of this Court entered on April 20, 2017 be, and they hereby are, affirmed.          PER ORDER:          Nicholas DiFilippo, Administrator          DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION           OLSSON, J.          This matter is before the Appellate Division on the employee's claim of appeal from the decision and decree of the trial judge denying an allegation of his original petition that he suffered a loss of earning capacity from July 6, 2016 through November 4, 2016, due to a right trigger finger injury he sustained in December 2015. At the pretrial conference, the parties stipulated that the employee developed a work-related right trigger finger. The trial judge entered a pretrial order awarding the employee partial incapacity benefits from July 6, 2016 to November 4, 2016. From this pretrial order, the employer filed a timely claim for trial. Following trial, the judge found against the employee, citing a lack of evidence that the injury had caused a loss of earning capacity, and the employee filed a claim of appeal. After a comprehensive review of the record and consideration of the arguments of both parties, we deny the employee's appeal and affirm the decision and decree of the trial judge.          George Webber (the employee), who is right-hand dominant, testified he worked as a data analyst, writing, programming, and running computer codes for Utilidata, Inc. (the employer). On or about December 1, 2015, he experienced an onset of pain and swelling in his hand and index finger after operating the computer mouse continuously for a number of hours. The employee continued to work without interruption until July 1, 2016, when he was laid off.          The employee related that, in the seven (7) month interim between the December 1, 2015 onset of injury and his July 1, 2016 layoff, "I had to switch over to using the left hand with my mouse, and I could do it, although that's definitely not my preferred way of operation." Tr. at 19:16-18, The employee said he also noticed a dull pain in his finger when writing. He eventually met with his primary care provider, Dr. Russell Zide, who took x-rays and referred him to an occupational therapist, whom he saw on one occasion in June of 2016. The therapist provided him a hand splint to wear at night which immobilized his right index finger.          After his layoff, the employee began treating with Dr. Scott T. Schmidt on July 6, 2016, the earliest appointment the doctor had available. He asserted that he informed the doctor that he had been laid off. The employee initially applied for unemployment benefits immediately following his layoff but did not complete the process. After discussion with Dr. Schmidt, the employee applied for and received Temporary Disability Insurance benefits. Dr. Schmidt advised him to not use the mouse with his right hand, as that was the primary aggravating activity, and avoid doing anything else that aggravated his symptoms.          The employee explained that his job primarily involved computer work but he also did some writing each day in order to make notes to himself on printed copies of code he was working on and to keep track of tasks. He asserted that note-taking computer programs were not appropriate for this function.          On cross-examination, the employee acknowledged that he never made any complaints to his supervisors that he was having difficulty performing his job and did not report the injury until after he was laid off. He agreed his job...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT