Wetch v. Midcontinent Media, Inc., 120119 SDWC, 141, 2013/14

Case DateDecember 01, 2019
CourtSouth Dakota
David W. Wetch
v.
Midcontinent Media, Inc. and Crum & Forster Commercial Ins.
HF No. 141, 2013/14
South Dakota Workers Compensation
December 1, 2019
          David S. Barari Goodsell Quinn LLP           Jason Groves Groves Law Office           Thomas J. Von Wald Boyce Law Firm LLP          RE: HF No. 141, 2013/14 – David W. Wetch v. Midcontinent Media, Inc. and Crum & Forster Commercial Ins.           Joe Thronson, Administrative Law Judge.          Dear Mr. Barari, Mr. Groves, and Mr. Von Wald:          This letter addresses the following submissions by the parties:          August 15, 2019 Employer/Insurer’s Motion for Factual Determination Regarding Supervised Living Accommodations          Affidavit of Thomas Von Wald          September 9, 2019 Claimant’s Response to Motion for Factual Determination Affidavit of David S. Barari          September 30, 2019 Employer/Insurer’s Reply Brief, Supplemental Affidavit of Thomas Von Wald          In addition, a hearing was held April 18, 2018, before the Department of Labor and Regulation, ALJ Joe Thronson presiding. David S. Barari and Jason Groves appeared on behalf of Claimant and Richard Travis appeared telephonically on behalf of Employer/Insurer.          ISSUE PRESENTED: SHOULD THE DEPARTMENT RENDER A DETERMINATION ON THE SUFFICIENCY OF CLAIMANT’S SUPERVISED LIVING ACCOMMODATIONS?          FACTS          As part of his treatment, Claimant has been receiving assistance from in-home care aides. Beginning in December 2018, HomeInstead, a third-party entity, began providing one care giver for around- the-clock care. In addition, it also provided a second care giver between the hours of 8:00 AM and noon, and again between 8:00 PM and midnight. In March 2019, Claimant requested HomeInstead to increase coverage to two caregivers to provide twenty-four-hour care.          A short time later, HomeInstead began reporting to Insurer instances in which Claimant was belligerent and threatening towards staff. The staff claimed that Claimant would often refuse...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT