Zachhowarth v. Collard Enterprises, Inc., 092419 RIWC, 2015-03091

Case DateSeptember 24, 2019
CourtRhode Island
ZACHHOWARTH
v.
COLLARD ENTERPRISES, INC.
W.C.C. 2015-03091
Rhode Island Worker Compensation
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Providence, SC
September 24, 2019
          FINAL DECREE OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION          This matter came to be heard by the Appellate Division upon the claim of appeal of the petitioner/employee and upon consideration thereof, the employee's appeal is denied and dismissed, and it is          ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:          That the findings of fact and the orders contained in a decree of this Court entered on September 30, 2016 be, and they hereby are, affirmed.          Nicholas DiFilippo, Administrator.           Olsson, J., Salem, J., Mimcucci, J.          DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION           OLSSON, J.          This matter is before the Appellate Division on the employee's appeal from the denial of his petition to review seeking to amend the description of his work-related injury to add injuries to his neck and back. In a previous petition (W.C.C No. 2015-01755), the court found that the employee had sustained a burn injury to his right hand and forearm which resulted in partial incapacity from October 30, 2014 through November 20, 2014. At the pretrial conference regarding the present matter, the employee's petition to review was denied and the employee timely filed a claim for trial. In his bench decision denying the employee's petition, the trial judge concluded that the employee was not a credible witness and rejected his physician's medical opinion because it was based upon an incomplete and inaccurate history. After a thorough review of the record and consideration of the arguments put forth by the parties, we deny and dismiss the employee's appeal.          The employee, Zach Howarth, testified that he was a union electrician and was sent from the union hall on October 27, 2014, to work on a job for the employer, Collard Enterprises, Inc. His job assignment was to replace fluorescent light fixtures with LED fixtures in the ceiling of a RDPTA bus terminal. The employee explained that he set up a ladder, climbed up to the ceiling, removed the ceiling tiles of the suspended ceiling, and reached in to pull the wires out of the fixture. Unfortunately, one of the wire connections was live causing the employee to receive an electric shock throughout his body. In order to break the circuit, he intentionally stepped back off of the ladder. He stated that he landed on the floor "on one foot and proceeded to catch [his] balance" with his other foot. Tr. at 7:9-10.          After taking a ten (10) to fifteen (15) minute break to gather himself, the employee returned to work. He noticed that both his right hand and his forearm had burn marks from the electric shock which he covered with a Band-Aid, a wrap, and a glove. He did not seek any medical treatment and continued to work that day and the following day. The employee stated that he had pain in his hand and some stiffness in his neck and low back. On October 30, 2014, he went to Atmed Treatment Center (Atmed) where he received treatment for the burns to his right hand and forearm. He did not express any complaints regarding his back and neck at this initial visit or the three (3) subsequent follow-up visits, nor did he report these complaints to any co-worker or to the employer.          Atmed referred the employee to Pappas Physical Therapy (Pappas) where he received physical therapy for his right hand and forearm on ten (10) different occasions from October 30, 2014 to November 21, 2014. The employee asserted that he complained of neck stiffness to one of the physical therapists on one occasion but...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT